TOG
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2003;5:1:10-13

Copyright © 2003 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitchener, H. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kitchener, H. C

Reviews

The value of human papillomavirus testing

Henry C Kitchener, MD FRCS(GIas) FRCOG, Professor of Gynaecological Oncology

Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Whitworth Park, Manchester, M13 OJH, UK. email: hkitchener{at}central.cmht.nwest.nhs.uk

Exfoliative cervical cytology has endured for 50 years and has been proven to reduce deaths from cervical cancer. Despite this, it lacks sensitivity and is also labour intensive. Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been shown to be a more sensitive test for detection of underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Because HPV is a necessary event in cervical carcinogenesis HPV testing has a very high negative predictive value, which is a valuable attribute in a diagnostic test. Three settings have been investigated: triage for low-grade cervical cytology, follow-up after treatment of CIN and primary cervical screening. The evidence for HPV testing is presented and an assessment of how it may develop in the UK.

Keywords Keywords / cervical neoplaisa / human papillomavirus (HPV) / screening / testing







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.