TOG
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2004;6:1:21-25

Copyright © 2004 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cuckle, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cuckle, H.

Screening Review

Principles of screening

Howard Cuckle, BA MSc DPhil, Professor of Reproductive Epidemiology

University of Leeds, Leeds Screening Centre, Gemini Park, Sheepscar Way, Leeds, LS7 3JB, UK. email: h.s.cuckle{at}leeds.ac.uk (corresponding author).

Obstetricians and gynaecologists are involved in a wide spectrum of screening activities. These can lead to prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities and treatment of gynaecological diseases at earlier, more tractable stages. This article introduces the principles behind the design of screening tests and explains commonly used specialist terminology. Many factors may influence the results of screening studies so care must be taken in their interpretation. For example, the type of test(s) used, characteristics of the population studied, length of follow-up and various sources of bias or confounding variables may affect interpretation of results. The decision to use a particular screening test must be based on careful evaluation of its potential advantages and disadvantages, in both human and financial terms, and its suitability for its intended use.

Keywords Keywords / diagnosis / discriminatory power / predictive value / prevention / screening







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.