TOG
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2005;7:1:50-51
doi: 10.1576/toag.7.1.050.27043
Copyright © 2005 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKenna, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dornan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McKenna, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dornan, J.

Views and Counter Views

Who's looking for the high-risk fetus in the low-risk mother?

Daniel McKenna, MD MRCOG

Subspecialty Trainee in Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Royal Jubilee Maternity Service, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BB, UK. email: dan.mckenna{at}virgin.net (corresponding author)

James Dornan, MD FRCPI FRCOG

Professor and Director of Fetal Medicine, Royal Jubilee Maternity Service, Belfast, UK.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines on routine antenatal care for the healthy pregnant woman acknowledge that low-risk mothers almost invariably give birth in a straightforward manner to low-risk babies. They do not, however, address the difficulties of identifying the high-risk fetus in the low-risk mother. Of the 4000 annual `unexplained' stillbirths in the UK, 1000 are below the tenth centile for birthweight. We believe that ultrasound assessment of fetal wellbeing and growth should be part of the routine examination of the fetus.

Keywords Keywords / antenatal care / ultrasound scanning / high-risk fetus / intrauterine growth restriction







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.