TOG
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2005;7:3:159-165
doi: 10.1576/toag.7.3.159.27095
Copyright © 2005 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, H. C
Right arrow Articles by Slack, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, H. C
Right arrow Articles by Slack, M.

Review

Evidence-based management of stress urinary incontinence

Helen C Johnson, MRCOG, Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist

Hinchingbrooke and Addenbrooke's Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.

Mark Slack, MMed FCOGSA(SA) MRCOG, Consultant Gynaecologist

Department of Urogynaecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK. email: mark.slack{at}addenbrookes.nhs.uk (corresponding author)

A wide range of conservative and surgical managements exists for stress urinary incontinence. The evidence base for these interventions is variable. This is particularly the case for the newer surgical treatments, where surgical innovation has grown ahead of the available research. In this review we link the evidence base with the interventions available.

Keywords Keywords / evidence-based / stress urinary incontinence / surgery / pharmacology / lifestyle







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.