TOG
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2005;7:4:233-240
doi: 10.1576/toag.7.4.233.27117
Copyright © 2005 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oláh, K. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oláh, K. S

Review

Vaginal hysterectomy in the absence of prolapse

Karl S Oláh, FRCS MRCP(I) FRCOG

Consultant and Honorary Senior Lecturer in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Warwick Hospital, Lakin Road, Warwick, CV34 6BW, UK. email: karl.olah{at}btinternet.com

The perceived advantages of subtotal hysterectomy have not been realised and the procedure can result in continued symptoms in 10% of women. Vaginal hysterectomy should be considered the operation of choice for the majority of women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Many of the traditional contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy are no longer valid and the incidence of operative injury is low. Most gynaecologists have the skills required to perform vaginal hysterectomy in the absence of prolapse and there are distinct advantages to this approach. An effort should be made to encourage the next generation of gynaecologists to acquire the appropriate skills.

Keywords Keywords / abdominal hysterectomy / oophorectomy / vaginal hysterectomy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.