TOG
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2006;8:1:45-49
doi: 10.1576/toag.8.1.045.27208
Copyright © 2006 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noble, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Noble, A.

Views and Counter Views

Litigation concerning obstetric brachial plexus palsy: an alternative view

Anthony Noble, FRCS (Ed) FRCOG, Emeritus Consultant

Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, Hampshire, UK. Business address: Orchard House, Bramshaw, SO43 7JG, UK E-mail: tony{at}thenobles.co.uk

This paper provides a defence expert's view of the present medico-legal scene with regard to obstetric brachial plexus palsy and sets out the reasons why case law has become more favourable towards Defendants.

Keywords expert witness / medico-legal / obstetric brachial plexus palsy / shoulder dystocia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.