TOG
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2006;8:3:171-176
doi: 10.1576/toag.8.3.171.27253
Copyright © 2006 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delhanty, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Delhanty, J. D.

SAC review

Molecular cytogenetics in obstetric practice

Joy DA Delhanty, FRCPath FRCOG, Emeritus Professor of Human Genetics

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, UK E-mail: j.delhanty{at}ucl.ac.uk

Results from the culture and full karyotyping of prenatal samples typically take at least 14 days to obtain. In contrast, results from the latest molecular cytogenetic techniques for the most common aneuplodies are available within 24-48 hours of receipt. A recent interim recommendation by the UK National Screening Committee was that new screening programmes for Down syndrome need not include follow-up karyotyping. In this article, the advantages and disadvantages of these tests are discussed. Evidence is available to support that they are accurate and efficient enough to be used as stand-alone tests, provided that a policy is implemented to ensure full karyotyping of all samples where fetal anomalies have been detected on ultrasound.

Keywords comparative genomic hybridisation / interphase FISH / molecular cytogenetics / preimplantation diagnosis / quantitative fluorescent PCR







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.